Hiring for judgment under pressure.
Some days a desk loses $5 million. The best analysts are back at 6:00 a.m., trading well. That's composure under loss, and it never shows up on a résumé. A short spoken screener hears it in a candidate's own words before the first interview, then shows the hiring team which desk each person would make stronger.
Drag through the day. The screener listens for what a candidate does at the bottom of the curve.
Written in the language of a desk, not a classroom. Each one is built from IMPACTER's eight validated competencies, so the same machine learning engine that reads student voice reads these answers. Nothing is self-reported. Every level points back to something the candidate said.
Hard-to-measure skills usually surface in the final round, if at all. Here they arrive first, so interviewers spend their hour testing what the screener found instead of hunting for it.
Answers five spoken prompts on a phone, on their own time. Real situations: a loss, a misread, a hedge, a team, a reason.
Gets a profile on six durable skills, each level backed by the candidate's own words, and a best-fit desk.
Opens with follow-up questions written for that candidate, aimed at the one skill the screener couldn't settle.
A systematic desk wants ice-cold discipline. A regional gas desk wants people who can feel the market. A structured LNG desk wants people who can hold a 15-year conviction and its hedge at the same time. Pick a desk, then build it from the cohort.
Tap a candidate to add or remove them. Up to five seats.
Each dot is one candidate. Most people are strong in two or three skills, not all six, which is why one composite score would hide the hire you actually need.
Sort by any skill. Candidate 0417 has a full sample report: the five answers, the evidence behind each level, and the questions an interviewer would ask next.
Graduate Trader, Gas & Power. Exemplary market read, a composure story worth one more question, and a clear best-fit desk.